top of page
Notebook%252520and%252520Pen_edited_edited_edited.jpg

S1 E2 Leadership & Governance 
Transcript

S1 E2 Leadership & Governance: About Us

Laurel   00:00

Quick listener note, any medical information discussed here is not intended to act as professional medical advice. Always consult your personal physician before making any medical decisions.


Rachael  00:15

Just, I watch Jaws every summer, because that's just like, it's so bad. It's good, right? Like, it's so ridiculous. But this summer as I was watching it, and someone else pointed this out, I guess they had watched it too. But as I was watching it, I was like, wow, this is exactly what is happening. Right now. In America. The whole premise of the whole story is this mayor of the town wants to keep the beaches open, because they're going to suffer economically if they shut down the beach town during the summer. Well, but obviously they have to there's a man-eating shark, right? So I guess like, duh, you have to close it down until they get the shark. And as I was watching this, I was like, Oh, this It'll make a great paper when somebody doesn't write it for me already. Because that's that's exactly where we are like, um, it's very clear to me that the economy is the priority. And I mean, Trump has, has clearly stated that he doesn't really care about people that don't look like him. I mean, in one way or another, right. And so it's at the expense of minorities, that the economy keeps running.


Laurel   01:34

That was my friend and former coworker, Rachel Sears. She's been a teacher for 15 years, teaching a variety of subjects and grade levels, mainly middle school and high school English and Social Studies. She's the kind of person who would go out of her way to write you a note or make you a cake just to make sure you feel appreciated. So to see our political leadership seemingly not caring about people's lives and, in her view, flippantly sacrificing them to the economy, was appalling to her. And she wasn't the only one who had opinions about the way leadership has handled this crisis. It was a common theme throughout our conversations both inside and outside education circles. This question of what represents good leadership is one that has major consequences, both in our local context and around the world.


Gauravi   02:20

Welcome to Learning in a Time of Corona, a slice of life podcast that explores the daily experiences of living and learning in Mumbai in Houston in the context of the Coronavirus pandemic.


Laurel   02:33

Today's episode is dedicated to exploring insights around leadership, what it means for our handling of crises like this one, and what role education has to play in the formation of future leaders.


Gauravi   02:45

Governance is meant to be a collaborative process, both by and for the people. Today we unpack how government responses to COVID were conceptualized and enacted.


Gauravi   02:58

I love that analogy that is just such a great way to put it. Somebody's leaving a beach open, even though there's a man eating shark, because of course, we can't have the businesses shut down. I think that's really funny. And honestly, it's very accurate to how I feel like the rest of the world has been perceiving the United States in particular. Um, what do you think?


Laurel   03:23

Yeah, I mean, it's funny, but at the same time, not funny. You know what I mean? It's one of those things where, of course, it's funny because it's ridiculous. It's a ridiculous thing for someone to do, for a leader to decide when there's clearly a man-eating shark in the water, you know? But at the same time, it's not funny because unfortunately, that decision has led to the deaths of thousands of people and sickness for tens of thousands more, you know? And so I can see how it is funny on the surface, but then once you think a little bit more about the consequences, it starts to become less funny.


Gauravi   04:01

This whole year has been a bit like that we've been it's been like this is like a really bad movie that this would never happen in their lives. And I feel like I mean, it's definitely the analogy is great for for the US but I feel like it's slightly different in India. I feel like we're, it's been more like there's a man eating shark, and let's just shut the whole beach down and like, figure it out, you know, I'm sure he'll go away. And I feel like that's, that's also problematic in its own way, obviously. But I feel like there's been so many different ways of processing this pandemic. And one of the ways, one of the major considerations has been because it's been so unprecedented. I think we've all been looking to our governments and our leaderships and just our global system for guidance and advice. More than we do in other times. You really don't know what to do you really don't have a context for how, as an ordinary human being, how am I supposed to be reacting? We've all been kind of been like, okay, tell me what to do now. And yeah, what they've been saying matters.


Laurel   05:19

Yeah. And I mean, I know the rest of the world has been kind of looking on the United States and I don't want to say enjoying our fall because I feel like that's that's making it seem to malicious. You know? I don't really think it's that, but it's almost like just being awestruck by the fall, maybe? And I, I think as as an American, it's especially disturbing watching this fall and seeing how we've gone from being able to, in some ways, consider ourselves a leader. Of course, we can problematize that as well. But in some ways, a leader and then to just see all of that get washed away in one fell swoop.


Gauravi   06:09

Definitely I feel like it is from like a movie Hollywood perspective. And even in real life, we tend to view, we tend to hold the United States up to a global standard. And of course, that's how the United States positions itself as well. Everybody has to hold it up to a global standard. But then in this case, it's been like this has been such this has been one of the biggest, it's the biggest crisis, global crisis, that I've seen in my lifetime for sure. And the United States has just, leadership has been questionable. Let's let's put it like that. definitely been questionable.

S1 E2 Leadership & Governance: Text

Laurel   06:48

From the beginning, Houstonians have received mixed messages regarding the severity of the coronavirus pandemic. Government messaging seemed to be in constant conflict with the federal and state level insisting there's no need for alarm, while the local government highlighted an urgent need to take precautions. With this inconsistency came confusion even suspicions that the reported number of coronavirus deaths was being inflated for political or economic reasons. In order to clear this up for myself, I spoke with my friend Teresa who works as an epidemiologist in Houston.


Teresa  07:21

So I guess if you need a definition for an epidemiologist first, a lot of people kind of colloquially just call like a disease detective.


Laurel   07:29

A disease detective. Essentially, it's Teresa's job to track and prevent the spread of COVID-19 in the Houston area by communicating with patients, determining who they could have possibly infected, and giving advice on what they can do to prevent spreading it to anyone else. Teresa typically is better at seeing both sides of an issue than I am. So I asked her about how confident she felt in the accuracy of the numbers reported by Harris County Public Health, which as of this recording, have reached over 98,000 cases, and over 1000 deaths just in Harris County alone. So I asked her, can we trust these numbers?


Teresa  08:11

There's a lot of documentation that has to get put together in order to file for death cases. I have just started learning that. So I think at least in terms of our department, it seems like if anything, deaths are probably being underreported because we're now having to find other ways to like provide evidence to the State Department, not the State Department, but the department at the Texas State level. To indeed confirm, yes, this is a death related to COVID. The scientists part of me is just very frustrated that we're still here in August and we now have enough cities and countries that have figured it out. Because it is absolutely something we have a solution for or so many solutions, right? Like not one size fits all solution. And we have many solutions for it and we're just not executing any one particular thing. So that I think is the most frustrating part.


Laurel   09:14

She went on to say how it is hard to be certain either way, but that her gut instinct tells her that due to under testing, our actual numbers of COVID-19 cases are probably underreported, too. So the question that's been rolling around in my brain is, if the problem really exists, is likely worse than we know, and we have multiple possible solutions, then why is it that the numbers keep rising in Houston at a pace of 1000 new cases per day? Vincent Nuñez, a recent graduate of YES PREP Northbrook high school, where I used to work, and a prominent member of his school's leadership program offered some great insight into this.


Vincent  09:51

And that's the thing also that the government is and being like united. And that's the thing that people feed us off to like Texas the government of Texas this is not it's not being you know, they're not all uniting, the Houston is not united.


Laurel   10:16

So not only has our government provided mixed messaging regarding the severity of COVID-19, but they have also been battling themselves in regard to the appropriate policies to enact Houston's mayor and the Harris County judge advocated for swift action to be taken implementing stay at home orders and mask mandates, only to be told by the state governor's office that they do not have the authority to do so. Texas was actually one of the first states to reopen in early May, and the governor's executive order functioned as an override of local government policy. By the time the governor finally decided to issue a statewide masked mandate In July, the damage had already been done. Education at the state level also has been in conflict with the perspectives of many local school districts with the Texas Education Agency, also referred to as TEA, decided to continue with the administration of state tests for this current school year. And coupled with that, they placed strict limitations on how long schools can offer purely virtual instruction, regardless of the fact that cases continue to increase. So what gets me is that our leaders had time to come together to make these choices. You know? We watched as countries like Italy and Spain and even in our own country, the state of New York suffered from this virus, we had time to come up with a unified plan to implement one of the many solutions Teresa alluded to. So why didn't we? Why did we remain divided in this way?


Gauravi   11:47

There's so much to unpack here. And I feel like we'll talk more about Mumbai in a minute. And the problems are there, but they're different. And I think that that's something that that's been confusing for the rest of the world in the way we've been viewing what's happening in the United States as well, like this lack of unity and clarity. It's also a little confusing in the context. So we also have, like decentralized systems. So to certain extent, I do understand when you say, when you talked about the governor's executive order, overriding local government policy, things like that. But normatively, is that is that normalized. Is that okay, for certain for bodies and government to have such completely polarized opinions on things like mask wearing?


Laurel   12:42

Right. I mean, that, I guess, is the crux of this question, right? It seems like it should be something that we should be able to align on, right? It doesn't seem like something that should be politicized as much as it has been. And I think that in least in the context of Houston, There's a lot actually in regards to racial and gender power dynamics at play here. Our mayor of Houston, Mayor Turner, he is a Black man and the county judge, Lina Hidalgo, she is a Latina woman, you know. And so, our state governor, Greg Abbott, he's a white man. And I've I also, my parents live in Montgomery County, and their county judge is a white man. And just the difference in how the I saw the governor respond to the local orders that are that the Houston mayor and that Judge Hidalgo put in was vastly different compared to his response when Mark Keough, who is the county judge in Montgomery County refused, said literally, he wrote on his social media and everything, that he's not going to enforce the mask mandate that the governor ultimately put out. So essentially, the governor was able to, or felt comfortable enough overriding the decisions that were made by the the Houston officials. That were the mayor and Harris County judge, but he didn't give as much pushback against the Montgomery County judge.


Gauravi   14:25

Okay, I think that's going to be even for me that's hard to keep track. So basically, one side of it is a racialized body and one side of it, someone is not a is not a racialized body as a white man. And so what of what you're kind of getting at is that the opinions of the Montgomery County judge the white man, Mr. Mark, were more easily sort of absorbed or or not, override it like those decisions and decisions will not override it. Wow. That's really In a problematic, interesting, I don't know what to say because it's very it's it's a lot of process, that sort of racial politicization of a pandemic. And a solution like mask wedding also comes down to ratio paradigm dynamics. That's very disconcerting, I suppose is the right word.


Laurel   15:22

Yeah, which I also just want to add, obviously, that the state governor and also the Montgomery County judge, they're Republicans, right. Um, whereas in Houston proper, there in Harris County, there, it's much more of towards the Democratic Party and, and so because of that, there's also that kind of rivalry, I suppose, and the ideological rivalry that's there, but I do think that we, we can't just chalk it up to a left versus right, just kind of fighting each other in that way because the way that people resisted, particularly Judge Hidalgo's orders, they used a lot of racialized attacks against her. Not necessarily the governor directly, but just people that were that were speaking out against that. And also, in particular, I know there was a group of police officers who actually wrote an entire response to her when she put out the mask mandate, saying that they weren't going to take orders from her. And that's just unprecedented like that, that just doesn't happen when it's a white man that is in in the role of county judge.


Gauravi   15:42

So I have two questions. One is do you think that this is, this is different because of the current political climate in the United States? Do you think that the pandemic would have been handled differently if there wasn't such a polarizing figure sitting somewhere? And the second question is though, I have a hard time understanding why the mask mandate is not just accepted. I, it's very hard to understand. From an ideological perspective, from a logistical perspective, I do understand that some people have issues some people can't access masks or, you know, it's it's a pain. I mean, I hate wearing my mask. Right. But ideologically, why is it so problematic? I don't I don't understand that.


Laurel   17:32

I mean, I, I think to answer your question, I do think that the current political climate has a lot to do with why an issue that really, from an outsider perspective shouldn't seem political has turned political. You know, it was something that originally, you know, our, the president, President Trump. You know, he was saying from the beginning that it was under control. But it's not a big deal. And so it kind of, to to start saying, "Yes, we need to wear masks" to start saying, "Yes, we need to stay home," that would be going against basically what he had said, right? That would be counter-arguing the idea that it's not a big deal. So instead, a lot of, particularly Republican leaders, a lot of conservative leaders, just decided to continue with this idea that it's not actually that big of a deal. They really liked to frequently talk about how it's only 2% of people that die. It's only older people that die. And I think it's also really important to note that there were protests literally against the stay at home orders that were happening all over the country, and also here, and, and those protests I noticed kind of popped up not too long after it was made public that it's largely people of color that are being disrupted. impacted by this virus. I think that definitely has a role to play in how people decided to look at this virus and its importance. So, yeah, and then at the end of the day the argument that they use when they're trying to justify it because, they don't they don't outright say, I mean, they'll bring their Confederate flags to their stay at home protest, But, I know, I'm laughing once again, like with Jaws, because it's ridiculous. But also once you get deeper it is incredibly harmful.


Gauravi   19:32

Yeah, it is. It is incredibly harmful. But I still, I still have a hard time grasping though. I mean, I get that okay, Dan was downplaying it. Even if you're downplaying it, though, like beyond the point you can see that it's happening. Why can't you wait a minute, why can't you take basic precautions for yourself and for other people?


Laurel   19:52

Yeah. So I, the argument that a lot of people are using is that it's a personal freedom issue. A lot of have people that are opposed to the masks are saying that it's depriving them of their personal liberty. And, you know, that feeds into or from this idea of American individualism, that in some circumstances can be really great. But in circumstances like this, where we're asking you, you're not wearing this mask for yourself, you're wearing it to help other people. When you're operating under a culture that's hyper-individualistic, that kind of argument doesn't hold as much weight. And so we start seeing people making these decisions saying, "No, it's just, it's about me and I don't need to wear a mask. I don't want to."


Gauravi   20:42

Something that I'm considering as as we're talking about this is definitely I see what you're saying about American individualism. And that kind of perspective of, you know, it's my liberty. There is something to The idea that there's been protests against state mandated things and like stay at home orders. That is something do that. That's like, in my mind. Also, this is good democracy in action in a certain way as well, because you're not just sort of okay, Big Boss said so, let's just do it, which I think is different in another a very specific bodies are allowed to protest in specific bodies or not. And having a more community oriented mindset definitely has its positives, but also like, I feel like it's important to acknowledge that it also does mean though, that we had a much harder time pushing back against any kind of state mandated things. And it's very easy for certain bodies to execute state mandated things everywhere in India, for sure and in the US as well. So I do think there is some amount of positive to kind of being able to question what the state is telling you to do. I feel like that is good Democracy in action. But that being said, from a community and like a individual level, it blows my mind that it's such a simple thing to do- wear a mask. It's not complicated and and you know, we've been doing it medically for generations like your doctor wears a mask because you know that a mask is effective. It's it's not, there's no debate about whether or not masks, or there has never been a debate up until 2020, about whether or not medical like basic masks are effective. Doctors wear them, you know, watch Grey's Anatomy, you know that doctors wear masks. It's pretty simple.


Laurel   22:35

Yeah. I really connect with what you're saying about how the fact that protests are still happening definitely is a proof of that, you know, Democracy is in action. However, I do wonder about whether a definition of a functioning democracy should also take into consideration credible information and the spread of misinformation, so I think that's a component to take into consideration.

S1 E2 Leadership & Governance: Text

Gauravi   23:07

In India, the challenge has not been ideological. There hasn't been any debate about the government's public intentions. At all levels, it's been clear that we took COVID seriously. And that the government intended to support its citizens in every way possible. But this does not really mean much, because execution, as we will see is the biggest challenge in India.


Maitreyee   23:32

And so it's like mixed responses. I see like a lot of counselors, a lot of times want to help. They, they understand the pain of people and like are empathetic about it, but they just don't have the resources. And I know that they've tried to decentralize it like the central government has told state governments to take care of things and then the state governments have delegated in order to like local Governments which is like BMC, in the case of Mumbai, but the Municipal Corporation I think at one point reached this like sort of despondent level of or in depth like it was sort of like indifferent. Like I spoke to a few counselors who said they want to help and they will try to help but then like a lot of others were indifferent and like, I feel like a lot of them are just like helpless because I do not think, I do not think there's enough coordination within BMC. I feel like it was very haphazardly conducted. Nobody knew what was happening. Nobody knew who the main point of contact should be. The counselors themselves or the operators themselves were like tired of being called.


Gauravi   24:49

So that was Maitreyee. She is a classic active citizen, in my opinion, she's been working with a lot of different bodies that are, that were providing aid on ground. And she herself was also involved with providing it on ground. So lots of coordination with the BMC, which is the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, or an easy way to remember it is the Bombay Municipal Corporation, which is the governing civic body in Mumbai.


Laurel   25:17

So just a quick question. Um, I heard you say Corporation when you were describing the organization that is in charge of making these decisions, is that actually like a private company? Or does that mean something different in the Mumbai con?


Gauravi   25:33

Oh, yeah, no, that is not a private company. It's an elected body. So I think elections are every five years also, corporation in India basically means more like a cooperative. So the it's like a more descriptive way of putting it it doesn't mean corporation as in private cooperation. So Mumbai is split into wards, and then each counselor is responsible for separate wards and the BMC is one mechanism of governance. There's also the state government, then on top of that the central government. So there are all these different layers, like there isn't any, any context. But you have to keep in mind though, that civic management in a city like Mumbai is chaotic. It's absolutely chaotic because you're dealing with so many different kinds of populations, different kinds of housing. And it's not, the city is not a planned city. There's all kinds of housing in all kinds of areas. As we've talked about in the first episode, the city is built on migrant laborers. There's a huge population of migrants, I can probably put up some statistics on our website. And even within we have, we have some of the largest slums in the world. So I think about maybe about 40% of the greater Mumbai population, that's about 9 million people also live in these slums, I can put up some links to that as well. And all these things basically mean that managing that kind of city is really, really difficult for the people who are in charge of managing that city. So for BMC counselors, I can imagine feeling a sense of kind of despondency helplessness, not knowing really what you're supposed to be doing either, even though there are protocols even though there are things in place. How do you actually implement those things and those gaps eventually lead to they affect the marginalized populations the most right, the government is intending to provide support. But in practice, that doesn't really always happen.


Marina   27:37

I mean, clearly, there is a huge gap in people's access to it to any form of relief in the first place. They don't have proper documentation, which is the first step to then get ready. So yeah, some people are getting some, some of the relief but it's not 100% at all.


Gauravi   27:55

So that was Marina Joseph. She is the Associate Director of YUVA, which is a voluntary development organization supporting and empowering the oppressed and marginalized by primarily concentrating on their human rights. I'll put a link to YUVA in our, on our website. YUVA is another great example of an organization that was basically borne out of a community action project and Marina has been leading their research efforts. So she had a lot of insights. They're working on a report to kind of outline the impact COVID has had. So that report talks more about these relief packages that the government announced. So there were a lot of different things, there was a lot of intention again to help, right. There was direct cash transfer, supplying food grains, providing gas cylinders, support additional support to construction workers who are particularly marginalized, collateral free loans, all these different mechanisms were put, like all these different intentions were put in place. But in order to access the schemes that the government provides, you need identification. You need bank accounts. You need all these structural mechanisms in place for these people to access that help. And to be fair, in the last couple of years, there has been a push from the government to get everyone digitized, open bank accounts, have common IDs, and all those kinds of things. But fundamentally, the same things that stopped people from being able to get those IDs, those same structural inequalities also stopped them from being able to get that aid. So it becomes it's like a loop that they get trapped in. And I feel like this is not a part of common consciousness. We're not really consciously aware of how difficult it is to get access to those identifications. When you yourself, for me, for example, I'm a body that doesn't face those challenges. So government support does not always reach the people who need it the most.


Sarika  29:59

So the situation was really really bad and while the state government and the central government were trying to do something, you know, there is always a question mark about the last mile reach and last mile connectivity as far as the government programs is concerned. So, I you know, I have always been saying that unfortunately a lot of decisions are, take place, you know, governance related decision or such decisions COVID, after COVID, decisions take place in an air-conditioned room in you know, some posh Hotel in Delhi. Which, you know, they are all, what I want to say is they are all top down, they are not bottom up. As a result, there is a huge gap in what the government across the world, I would say, really wants and what the people really want or what the people can do, you know, or what the people need to do. There is a huge gap not only in terms of reaching of financial help, but information, but intention, but on all different parameters there's a gap, and so I think, you know, our our experience with policies are different, you know. The decisions that the government takes has not been very positive in that sense because nothing really reaches the people.


Gauravi   31:30

Sarika kind of reinforces Maitreyee's point here, that trickle down is basically what's missing. And why it's missing, as she outlines again, is that there's really a lack of connect between who is planning and who they're planning for. So Sarika's organization, the Raah Foundation, they work with rural tribal communities who live a couple of hours outside of Mumbai, and they actually work with local government bodies on capacity building for these tribal communities.


Sarika  31:59

You need a much more decentralized kind of an approach rather than than a centralized approach, because the problems are very different in what works in Mumbai is definitely not going to work in Savara or Bukhara or other tribal area, it has to be very, very different approach. So it has to be much more customized, it has to be much more decentralized. So I personally felt that a one size fits all policy was is completely wrong and will never work.


Gauravi   32:29

So I think she makes a really great point about why, despite the government having the will, government intentions are often kind of failed. So it's not about intention in in a lot of different development contexts, not just in the context of COVID. They don't center, we don't end up centering the voices of the people that we're actually trying to develop or actually trying to help. And I feel like she talks about how the context, you need decentralized approaches in the context of rural versus urban, but Sarika also ended up mentioning how even within the context of Mumbai itself, that decentralization of decision making is important because you have such different populations with such different needs. So I feel like we need more governance to function the way Sarika's NGO functions, for example, is to have, you know, we need to be working with people instead of just working for people. And to my mind, the reason why this doesn't happen as much, is because I think it's a two pronged reason. One is definitely as Sarika identified, there's a really big distance, there's a big gap between high level decision makers and the on ground reality of the people they're making decisions for. The second though, is a question that I think comes back to us as educators. Are we doing enough as educators, are our systems of education doing enough to empower, to build capacity in local population? Are we fostering local leadership in an efficient manner?


Gauravi   34:11

Do you think that the local government doesn't have stay or that the local government does not have the skill ability will to kind of implement their say so to speak?


Sarika  34:25

Both? Actually, I will say they don't have, they definitely don't have the say. They're just told that this is what you're supposed to do. That is one. And secondly, very little effort has happened on their capacity building, you know. How do you build local capacity? How do you build local leaders? So very little effort has gone into that.

S1 E2 Leadership & Governance: Text

Gauravi   34:48

So I think this is the point that keeps coming home for me as an educator in what my role is for contributing to more equitable societies with more equal distances between leaders and the people they're leading. And I think in, in India and everywhere, arguably, these structural issues contribute to a gap even in access to good quality education, right. But even within that, I feel like in India, there's so many sort of inherent class, caste, social, religious based issues. That means that positions of leadership are determined so strongly by your privilege and the position that you're born in, for the most part, that local communities and local populations don't get enough of an involvement in their own governance in their own leadership. And even if they do, their skill building, I think that is what Sarika touches on really, but even if we have local leaders, our education systems are not doing a good enough job of fostering critical consciousness. That's not been a priority for way too many generations. So leadership is too much about power over people, rather than being about creating a good society, a strong society. And that's definitely come through to this COVID crisis in how the relationship between leadership and the people has been, we've seen it to be enacted in the context of Maharashtra, for sure.


Laurel   36:44

Yeah, and Houston, we definitely have a lot of top down types of leadership as well. And I know that that you were mentioning kind of the systems of power that come in there and that's definitely true here as well and it's with a lot of intersection, intersecting kind of systems of oppression that come into play.


Gauravi   37:07

But I would think that in the context of the US, at least at least general understanding is that your education systems focus on sort of critical consciousness more or better. Is that, is that true?


Laurel   37:25

Who... who's saying this?


Gauravi   37:31

Just the general perception that that they you know, that the US educates, the education system in the United States is one of the best word and


Laurel   37:38

Ah yeah, well, maybe in a neoliberal sense. There's certain ways, but even in that sense, we definitely don't have the highest test scores in the world. So I mean, it's funny that you say that because I feel like actually, in my classes in Canada, the United States was frequently used as a counter-example. "Don't be like this. They test way too much." Which, you know, I agree there's definitely a hyper-testing focus here. And then the second component of that as well has a lot to do with just a focus on punitive justice that is really common in our schools, particularly schools that serve students of color. And I mean, that that is, the whole school to prison pipeline is, it deserves its own episode in and of itself. But just in terms of like, ways of breaking that down, I actually was really lucky to work for a school that focused on restorative justice. And I think that really comes into play when we're talking about building leadership and making sure that, that I suppose, that capacity for leadership that you were talking about, to me it's always there. It's just a matter of building a culture and environment that actually values equity of voice so that that leadership potential can be realized. And a really great person that I've learned a lot, through his example, is actually my friend and former Dean of Instruction, Jeremy Williams. And he provided a lot of insight on this actually, when we were having our conversation for this podcast. Just a little background on Jeremy himself. He's a proud Howard University alumnus and he has a master's degree from Columbia University. He's currently pursuing a doctoral degree from Johns Hopkins while simultaneously working for Transcend Education, which is a nonprofit dedicated to innovative school design, which is just the perfect job for him because his commitment to social justice and equity, innovation, and education shines through in every conversation that I've ever had with him. And he is definitely the perfect person to learn from in terms of talking about how we should build future leaders, and I was actually lucky enough to be his co teacher in many of our circles that we facilitated with students.


Jeremy  40:04

But what I appreciated about our experience at the school was that we tried to be proactive, not just reactive. So we incorporated time built into the day where students could meet in community and do community building circles and talk about issues of trauma and talk about issues of race and class and privilege and etc. You know, one of the best things you can do is to get students that want to, that want to flex their leadership muscle and get them to lead that type of work. The best thing you can actually do is be a participant, right? Is be a participant. Your job is not to influence students to think one way or the other. Your job is to keep the space safe, by making sure that students are adhering to norms, to add your perspective in a way that doesn't illuminate or elevate your positional power. The skill set that it takes to know how to address situations where things are said that are inappropriate are no more difficult than a skill system it takes to create a safe classroom environment for biology content, right? And anyone can do it, the willingness to do it is the key. And it's something that students need just as much as they need all the, all the information and learning to pass all the standardized tests that you know, don't matter anyway.


Laurel   41:38

First of all, just to give credit where credit is due, the kind of circles that we would have that he was talking about what those discussions are derived from Indigenous healing circle practices, so I just wanted to give that credit there. But then also, just to connect with Jeremy's point, about how the skills you need to facilitate these conversations about privilege, oppression, you know, all these conversations that people want to ban from schools, really are the same skills that you need to build a safe classroom environment in the first place, right. And so I feel like there's a lot of pushback sometimes about the idea of talking about these systems of oppression and potentially controversial issues. But if you haven't thought about how to negotiate those kinds of conflicts, then probably you haven't really created a safer space in your classroom yet. If anything, it's just a silent space where no one can speak about these things that are relevant to their lives in school, outside of school. They're going to remain relevant to them later on when they're adults operating in the world, maybe trying to be leaders in the world, right. So if they haven't learned how to have these conversations, you know, and make these considerations in a constructive way beforehand. Then we're left with the kind of divisiveness I think that we see today.


Gauravi   42:54

Yeah, I think there's the, there's quite a bit though to think about, sort of the applicability of some of the things that Jeremy talks about. Students being able to sort of meet in community, in circles and community building circles and all of those things. You know, for India, those kind of education environments only exist in places of incredible privilege to be able to sit down and have these conversations. You need small classroom sizes, you need things that we just don't have realistically. And I think that comes back again to me, to localized leadership, even within education. What works in global education context does not work in every education context. For us, we need to find ways for our education to connect with our with locally relevant skill building and critical thinking that's looking and re-examining power structures within India, so. And I feel like we, we I don't even have a template to talk really about how we could do these things. There are incredible people doing incredible things, which we'll explore in other episodes, on ground to engage with local populations using education. But as someone who's been educated in foreign contexts in Canada, that's something I struggle with a lot is that a lot of the actual classroom solutions that are proposed, they're just not going to work here. You know, that's just not going to happen.


Laurel   44:35

Yeah, I mean, I can only imagine like how much of a structural change there would have to be in order, like you said, for, for it to even work because of classroom sizes and, and things like that. I just think, I just remember back to, to conversations we've had about questioning the power structures, right. And how really, you know, maybe building a sense of community is helpful for making people who have the means to help feel like it's their responsibility to help. But does that actually solve, kind of, the underlying issues? And I think that the goal mainly of this type of approach, whether you do it in circles or whether you find another way of engaging in these conversations, like having these conversations is really important in order to, to ensure that the leaders of the future are ones that are both aware of the structures and then also committed to dismantling them, you know. And so, in that way, I think that, that at the very least having these conversations, even if that looks different, is really important.


Gauravi   45:52

Yeah, absolutely. I completely agree. I feel like the approach needs to be so it's kind of like the paths that we take has to be contextual and relevant to the context that it's in. But the goal has to be critical consciousness and, and, unpacking power structures within society. And I'd say in India, that's definitely, you know, through this whole pandemic, I feel like as a community, we have shown that we are community-oriented. You know, we haven't had ideological debates about putting myself and my liberty before the liberty of other people. There's been a lot of aid, there's been a lot of how do we put food on the plates of people who needed the most. But within that, I think we don't question existing power hierarchies. We don't question why we always need to have a situation where some groups need to be in a position of helping others. And I think that's something that education needs to address differently, different pathways, but common goal, definitely.


Gauravi   46:57

In this episode, we talked about the different ways in which both our national and local governments handle the crisis, we saw some differences on how messaging about the pandemic as well as government support was enacted. In the next episode, we consider how communities across Mumbai and Houston dealt with the challenges brought on by the pandemic.


Ruben  47:17

Really people's movement across the city,


Maitreyee   47:20

Within the community. There's a lot of like solidarity.


Maria Gloria  47:25

It is difficult because how can you help? You know you feel powerless.


Laurel   47:31

That's next time on Learning in a Time of Corona.


Gauravi   47:37

To learn more about the topics we touch on the people we interviewed and the organizations they work with, visit our website learninginatimeofcorona.com.


Laurel   47:47

This podcast is written and produced by Laurel Bingman in Gauravi Lobo


Gauravi   47:52

Music and sound mixing by Shikhar Naad Qureshi.


Laurel   47:56

Special thanks to the University of Toronto for funding this project

S1 E2 Leadership & Governance: Text
S1 E2 Leadership & Governance: Text

©2020 by Learning in a Time of Corona. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page